Cree Mailing List Digest February 1997 X-List-Subscribe: X-List-Unsubscribe: X-List-Archive: X-List-Post: X-List-Owner: X-List-Help: , -> cree kinship terms by Nicole Stuckenberger <(suppressed)@uni-muenster.de> -> post.re.chief by (suppressed)@wsii.com (Peter s Gadoury) -> post/ancestry by (suppressed)@wsii.com -> Re: post/ancestry by (suppressed)@ccinet.ab.ca (arlenecolosimo) -> Re: cree kinship terms by (suppressed)@ccinet.ab.ca (arlenecolosimo) -> St.Damien de Brendan by (suppressed)@wsii.com -> metis by (suppressed)@wsii.com (Peter s Gadoury) -> Re: metis by Cardinal Lewis <(suppressed)@ucsub.Colorado.EDU> -> National Archives/Parish Records by (suppressed)@wsii.com (Peter s Gadoury) -> Gadoury's by (suppressed)@wsii.com (Peter s Gadoury) -> Hi! Mailing List Page and Recipes! by Sioux <(suppressed)@ideal.net.au> -> Uh Oh!!! I forgot the URL!!!!! by Sioux <(suppressed)@ideal.net.au> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 1 Feb 1997 05:43:24 -0500 From: Nicole Stuckenberger <(suppressed)@uni-muenster.de> Subject: cree kinship terms Hi, I am working on the conceptualization of the social among the Western Woods Cree, especially among the Rocky Cree. I found two geneological list of kinshipterms (Rossignol 1938 and Curtis 1928). They differ in many respects. The most problematic one is at least Curtis translations for the positions M, F, MB, MZ, FB, MB. If you use the analytical framework of Iroquois Cousin Terminology you would expect to find corresponding terms from ego's generation towards their parent's generation: F=FB MB und M=MZ FZ. But this is not the case in Curtis' terminology (Rossignol did not give any terms for this relations). His usage implies an bifurcate collateral system and not a bifurcate merging system. (Smith (1975) also wrote somewhere that they have a bifurcate collateral system with Iroqouis Cousin Terminology, but he did not see the contradiction in the system by saying so) Curtis terms are the following: M=nikawiy, F=notawiy, MZ=nitosis, FZ=nisikos, FB=nokomis, MB=nisis. (I ask you for pardon for the mistranscription of the terms, but I am not an expert in Cree). Now my questions? Could it be that Curtis' terminology reflects Plains Cree usage? Could you give me the correct terms for M,F,MB,MZ,FB,FZ? It would make me very happy to get replies on this topic, bye bye yours Nicole Stuckenberger e-mail: stucken@uni-muenster.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2 Feb 1997 12:12:27 -0500 From: (suppressed)@wsii.com (Peter s Gadoury) Subject: post.re.chief >>My accountant says originally his last name was Bousquet.He showed me >>a picture of an indian chief that was in the Providence journal,Prov- >>idence R.I.,does anyone know who this chief was and what tribe he was >>from.Origin is Quebec Canada. Please reply to Thom. >> ram@wsii.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 2 Feb 1997 12:35:44 -0500 From: (suppressed)@wsii.com Subject: post/ancestry I have recently come across some information as to my families origin I am a Gadoury/Dagoury when my ancestors came over from France in the early 1700's.My grandfather grew up in a little village named St. Damien de Brenden,which is north of St. Gabrielle.My question is does anyone know of any Cree/Gadoury's in that neck of the woods,if not what is a good route to take to find that information?? Thanks Thom Gadoury ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 3 Feb 1997 05:33:08 -0500 From: (suppressed)@ccinet.ab.ca (arlenecolosimo) Subject: Re: post/ancestry >I have recently come across some information as to my families origin >I am a Gadoury/Dagoury when my ancestors came over from France in the >early 1700's.My grandfather grew up in a little village named St. >Damien de Brenden,which is north of St. Gabrielle.My question is does >anyone know of any Cree/Gadoury's in that neck of the woods,if not what >is a good route to take to find that information?? > >Thanks Thom Gadoury > > >Thom ,I posted you a note already today but it may come back to me as I think that we are to use the cree@arpp.carleton .ca . So when it is returned to me I will put the above address on it,okay. You can also go to any good library and order micro fisch with ship passengersprinted on them however known the ship name or port of entry would help . I,ve been into some in ottawa and the are super to read .It takes about 3 hours per film if the family names are not in alphabetical order. TTYL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 3 Feb 1997 06:57:44 -0500 From: (suppressed)@ccinet.ab.ca (arlenecolosimo) Subject: Re: cree kinship terms >Hi, >I am working on the conceptualization of the social among the Western Woods Cree, especially >among the Rocky Cree. I found two geneological list of kinshipterms (Rossignol 1938 and Curtis >1928). They differ in many respects. The most problematic one is at least Curtis translations for the >positions M, F, MB, MZ, FB, MB. If you use the analytical framework of Iroquois Cousin >Terminology you would expect to find corresponding terms from ego's generation towards their >parent's generation: F=FB MB und M=MZ FZ. But this is not the case in Curtis' terminology >(Rossignol did not give any terms for this relations). His usage implies an bifurcate collateral system >and not a bifurcate merging system. (Smith (1975) also wrote somewhere that they have a bifurcate >collateral system with Iroqouis Cousin Terminology, but he did not see the contradiction in the >system by saying so) Curtis terms are the following: M=nikawiy, F=notawiy, MZ=nitosis, >FZ=nisikos, FB=nokomis, MB=nisis. (I ask you for pardon for the mistranscription of the terms, but >I am not an expert in Cree). >Now my questions? Could it be that Curtis' terminology reflects Plains Cree usage? Could you give >me the correct terms for M,F,MB,MZ,FB,FZ? > >It would make me very happy to get replies on this topic, >bye bye yours Nicole Stuckenberger >e-mail: stucken@uni-muenster.de > > >Nicole , Sorry ,You will have to dig deeper . Their are people before those two that did a super job of classification for the cree language .TTYL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 9 Feb 1997 14:35:11 -0500 From: (suppressed)@wsii.com Subject: St.Damien de Brendan I am searching for cree indians that are Gadoury's in the area of Canada north of Montreal listed in the subject.I believe that some Gadoury's inter mingled with the cree in the 1700's .I am trying to trace my routes any info would be greatly appreciated.Where in Canada are such records kept so that i might access this info.Thanks Thom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 11 Feb 1997 09:35:27 -0500 From: (suppressed)@wsii.com (Peter s Gadoury) Subject: metis Would a person who is french canadian and cree indian be considered a Metis. I currently reside in the U.S.and and trying to dig up info on my ancestry. thanks Thom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 11 Feb 1997 12:31:15 -0500 From: Cardinal Lewis <(suppressed)@ucsub.Colorado.EDU> Subject: Re: metis Thom, The answer is yes. Initially the Metis were recognized as having the mixed blood of French Candian and any First Nation. The definition has expanded to include any Euro and First Nation. As a point to note, the Canadian Constitution of 1982 defines Metis as an aboriginal group as distinct as any First Nation. For more info you may want to contact the Metis National Council in Ottawa for clearer guidelines than what I have given. Good Luck, - - Lewis Cardinal On Tue, 11 Feb 1997, Peter s Gadoury wrote: > Would a person who is french canadian and cree indian be considered a Metis. > I currently reside in the U.S.and and trying to dig up info on my ancestry. > thanks Thom ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 14 Feb 1997 09:50:25 -0500 From: (suppressed)@wsii.com (Peter s Gadoury) Subject: National Archives/Parish Records Does anyone have an address for the subject above E-mail or otherwise ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 22 Feb 1997 17:50:00 -0500 From: (suppressed)@wsii.com (Peter s Gadoury) Subject: Gadoury's Are there any Gadoury's out there whom are cree indian decendants?If give me a shout and let me know,thanks Thom Gadoury ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 23 Feb 1997 03:11:51 -0500 From: Sioux <(suppressed)@ideal.net.au> Subject: Hi! Mailing List Page and Recipes! Hello everybody!, Just thought I'd drop by and say hello. If any one would like to visit, I now have 63 lists on my Native American Mailing Lists page! If you know of any, please let me know and I'll add them. Also, I am starting a page for native american traditional recipes.....and I'd love to have your contributions! Tanyan Mani, Peace, Sioux ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 23 Feb 1997 04:40:01 -0500 From: Sioux <(suppressed)@ideal.net.au> Subject: Uh Oh!!! I forgot the URL!!!!! Hello everybody!, I forgot to include the URL.........stupid me! It is: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5559 ............................................................................. Just thought I'd drop by and say hello. If any one would like to visit, I now have 63 lists on my Native American Mailing Lists page! If you know of any, please let me know and I'll add them. Also, I am starting a page for native american traditional recipes.....and I'd love to have your contributions! Tanyan Mani, Peace, Sioux ---------------------------------------------------------------------- End of Digest